Thank you, Susan, for responding. I was figuring you had already signed off. I agree that you don't need to "defend" yourself. I was more worried about everyone calling someone a good breeder and not qualifying what makes one. Now that we have your philosophy firsthand, everyone can judge for themselves.
I will agree to disagree with your statement of "but i am also, along w/ a breeder of 20+ yrs that i have been working w/, smart enuff to know that if the Border is bred and sold only as a working dog, the breed will be on its way out as there are just not that many (and it is getting fewer) working farms anymore---so, breed for the integrity of the Border w/ the understanding that this is what makes them the top agility/flyball/frisbee dogs they can be....." because it implies that because I don't agree with your theory, that I am stupid, although I know that wasn't your intention. I don't think I understand how you breed for the integrity of the breed, yet believe that by doing so, the breed will be on its way out.
I am interested in the theory behind goose dog work. I know it differs quite a bit from working livestock. I have dogs that are natural gatherers, and some that are natural drivers. Which would make better prospects for goosedog work? Does training on geese then tranlate easily when you put those same dogs on stock?
Jodi




